You are confusing executives and hurting your credibility. Use the term “probabilistic outcome” instead.
@Michael Novak alerted me to an article in WIRED by Steven Levy defending AI Hallucinations
https://www.wired.com/story/plaintext-in-defense-of-ai-hallucinations-chatgpt/
I don't love the term "hallucination," though I think it's better than most. I'm not opposed to calling them "lies" either - I think new and non-technical users of LLMs should be thoroughly warned before assuming they're infallible.
@Michael Novak alerted me to an article in WIRED by Steven Levy defending AI Hallucinations
https://www.wired.com/story/plaintext-in-defense-of-ai-hallucinations-chatgpt/
I don't love the term "hallucination," though I think it's better than most. I'm not opposed to calling them "lies" either - I think new and non-technical users of LLMs should be thoroughly warned before assuming they're infallible.